What is your opinion on the NIH study? The one they market as the Lipkin study

[CTD]

A predictable outcome is to announce a negative NIH study. A new focus will shift from MRV's and concentrate on Rituximab. These CFS researchers will likely call CFS 'autoimmune', ignoring that autoimmunity is associated to retroviruses. This has already been done by Dr Kogelink who never once mentions MRV's found by Hanson/Bell/Ruscetti/Mikovits etc and only VP62 'XMRV' as does Dr Peterson.

A smarter outcome (for the state) and a somewhat stroke of public relations genius would be to announce a retrovirus (HERV) as a cause of 'chronic fatigue'. Then get the ME patients to 'believe' in a known ''newly discovered'' pathogen in people with 'chronic fatigue' suffer from, and steer eyes and ears away from ME and neuroinflammation and MRV's. For that, you may need a 'virus hunter' aligned to historic deniers of ME via CFS.....Fauci/Reeves/Strauss

It would also nicely block people venturing into Autism and MS Cancer and Dementia by looking for MRV's....that were ''proven to be a red herring with XMRV''.

[V99]

NIH "Lipkin" study - retesting to get the result the Government wants would be wrong!

Is this why there is a delay?

We know it is not a replication study and that sections of the assays are out of the hands of those who can find the viruses.

What if the delay is to sort the serology results? Which will only identify positives, and issues with controls/patients.

They can't keep getting them to tests until the Government gets the results they want. The design is already no good for finding the truth.

Sorry but this whole study stinks!

[jace (Staff)]

It is odd that nothing's been published yet, when originally it was to be ready by the beginning of this year...

[V99]

Would make sense that they retest until the results suit them. Disgusting too!